|
The Embryo as Human Being: A Scientific Case by Robert P. George et al. |
|
|
|
|
Written by Robert P. George, Maureen Condic & Patrick Lee
|
|
Monday, 20 July 2009 18:18 |
“The development of a human being begins with fertilization, a process by which the spermatozoon from the male and the oocyte from the female unite to give rise to a new organism, the zygote.” (Langman’s Medical Embryology, 7th ed., 1995)
For people who advocate the killing of embryonic human beings in the cause of biomedical research, the Holy Grail is an argument that would definitively establish that the human embryo, at least early in its development, is not a living human organism and therefore not a human being at all. The problem for these advocates is that all the scientific evidence points in precisely the opposite direction. Modern human embryology and developmental biology have shown that fertilization produces a new and distinct organism: a living individual of the human species in the embryonic stage of his or her development.
Some proponents of embryo-destructive research are willing to face up to these biological facts. They concede that human embryos are living individuals of the human species, but deny that this gives them the moral status of being persons. According to this argument, not all human beings are equal; not all possess inherent dignity and a right to life. Some, including those at early developmental stages, are not (or are not yet) “persons,” and they may therefore (at least in some circumstances, or in the pursuit of some goals) legitimately be killed.
There is much to be said against this position, but its defects are philosophical, not scientific. Its proponents recognize that there is no Holy Grail out there to find, and they are willing to defend the killing of human embryos while facing up to the biological facts. But then there are the Grail searchers. These people are determined to prove that what modern human embryology has been telling us is wrong, and to this end they scavenge the fields of molecular biology and human genetics.
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 03 August 2009 10:51 |
|
Amicus Curiae Brief of Mother Teresa |
|
|
|
|
Written by Robert P. George, Founder of the American Principles Project
|
|
Thursday, 11 June 2009 12:54 |
In 1994, APP founder Robert P. George served as Counsel to Mother Teresa of Calcutta on an amicus curiae
brief in the Supreme court of the United States in which she asked the Court
to reverse its decision in Roe v. Wade and declare "the unalienable rights of
the unborn child."
Reprinted below is the complete text of the amicus curae brief.
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 11:42 |
|
Our Struggle for the Soul of Our Nation |
|
|
|
|
Written by Robert P. George, Founder of the American Principles Project
|
|
Thursday, 22 January 2009 00:00 |
|
In remarks delivered yesterday at the Cardinal O’Connor Conference on Life, Robert P. George reflected on the history of the pro-life movement and offered advice for its future.
Thirty-six years ago tomorrow, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its infamous decision in Roe v. Wade and its companion case Doe v. Bolton. In the name of a generalized “right to privacy” allegedly implicit in the Due Process Clause of the Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment, seven justices created a license to kill the unborn.
|
|
Last Updated on Friday, 31 July 2009 14:52 |
|
|
|
|
|