<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Blog entries</title>
		<description>Blog entries</description>
		<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:44:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>Link roundup: statements from the Stupak coalition</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/link-roundup-statements-from-the-stupak-coalition.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;It appears the Democrat leadership is going to call Rep. Bart Stupak's &quot;bluff&quot; and go forward with their health care legislation vote in the House.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;APP's James Bell has compiled a list of the on-the-record statements made by members of the Stupak coalition so far. These are Democrats who have said they are not voting for the bill unless it is amended to include Stupak-approved language:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Steve Driehaus&lt;br/&gt;Marion Berry&lt;br/&gt;Joe Donnelly&lt;br/&gt;Dan Lipinski&lt;br/&gt;Kathy Dahlkemper&lt;br/&gt;Jim Oberstar&lt;br/&gt;Bart StupakRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>resources</category>
 <category>nancy pelosi</category>
 <category>health care</category>
 <category>bart stupak</category>
 <category>abortion</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Bowman: Are conservatives compassionate?</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/bowman-are-conservatives-compassionate.html</link>
			<description>APP is happy to welcome back our favorite Friday columnist Joshua Bowman, who now writes (as the muses inspire him) at Prolix Patriot.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;border: 1px solid black; margin: 8px; float: right;&quot; src=&quot;http://psalmtrees.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/founding_fathers.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;283&quot; height=&quot;254&quot; /&gt;The greatest weakness of conservatism is the standard media trope that the GOP is filled with a bunch of heartless Ebenezer Scrooges.&amp;nbsp; Even as mighty a conservative figure as SiRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>conservatism</category>
 <category>app contribution</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Reports: Dem to begin final process Monday</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/reports-dem-to-begin-final-process-monday.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;First of all, the Associated Press suggests that the Democrat leadership is attempting to ignore the requests of Rep. Stupak's pro-life Democrats:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;House leaders have concluded they cannot change a divisive abortion provision in President Barack Obama's health care bill and will try to pass the sweeping legislation without the support of ardent anti-abortion Democrats.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;A break on abortion would remove a major obstacle for DeRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:50:18 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>reconciliation</category>
 <category>nancy pelosi</category>
 <category>lower chamber</category>
 <category>health care</category>
 <category>barack obama</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Report: Senate Parliamentarian deals critical blow to Obamacare?</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/report-senate-parliamentarian-deals-critical-blow-to-obamacare.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;From a breaking Roll Call report:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;The Senate Parliamentarian has ruled that President Barack Obama must sign Congress&amp;rsquo; original health care reform bill before the Senate can act on a companion reconciliation package, senior GOP sources said Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Senate Parliamentarian&amp;rsquo;s Office was responding to questions posed by the Republican leadership. The answers were provided verbally, sources said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;House Democratic leaders haRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:59:32 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>upper chamber</category>
 <category>parliamentary procedure</category>
 <category>health care</category>
 <category>harry reid</category>
 <category>bart stupak</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Health Care: Slaughter House Rules</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/health-care-slaughter-house-rules.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img style=&quot;border: 1px solid black; margin: 8px; float: left;&quot; src=&quot;http://m2.wnymedia.net/files/2009/08/slaughter.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;333&quot; height=&quot;223&quot; /&gt;It's appearing more and more likely that the House is going to use a controversial house provision to push through Obamacare (as if the reconciliation process being invoked in the Senate was not already controversial enough).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Brian Darling at the Foundry blog has a good explanation of what is being concocted:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-leRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:29:36 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>upper chamber</category>
 <category>pro-life</category>
 <category>pro-abortion</category>
 <category>lower chamber</category>
 <category>louise slaughter</category>
 <category>bart stupak</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Photopost: who is the Stupak coalition?</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/photopost-who-is-the-stupak-coalition-.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Who is the Stupak Coalition?&amp;nbsp; Who are these &amp;ldquo;at least twelve&amp;rdquo; Democrats who voted for health care reform last time but are willing to derail the President&amp;rsquo;s most cherished legislative agenda over the contentious issue of abortion?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Are they part of Bart Stupak&amp;rsquo;s imagination, as Rachel Maddow of MSNBC believes?&amp;nbsp; Are they Catholic pawns of the Roman Catholic Bishops as the Huffington Post argues?&amp;nbsp; Are they a faction of the conservative Blue Dog CoaliRead More...</description>
			<author>James Bell</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>stupak coalition</category>
 <category>pro-life</category>
 <category>nancy pelosi</category>
 <category>health care</category>
 <category>bart stupak</category>
 <category>barack obama</category>
 <category>abortion</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Report: 'Safe Schools' Czar Dodges Question on Whether to Promote Homosexuality</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/report-safe-schools-czar-dodges-question-on-whether-to-promote-homosexuality.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Kevin Jennings continues to avoid responding to the legitimate questions posed about his agenda for public eduction, and continues to avoid any opportunity to be transparent about it:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;Kevin Jennings, a leading gay activist and President Obama's &quot;Safe Schools&quot; Czar, dodged a question on whether the federal government should promote homosexuality as moral in public schools earlier this week. Instead, the embattled czar, who was the founder of the Gay, LesbianRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>safe schools</category>
 <category>public education</category>
 <category>preserve innocence</category>
 <category>kevin jennings</category>
 <category>glsen</category>
 <category>czars</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vulnerable Senate Seat Report: Barbara Boxer</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/vulnerable-senate-seat-report-barbara-boxer.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://americanprogress.org/issues/2008/05/img/boxer_large.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;450&quot; height=&quot;303&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;The days of Ronald Reagan are gone and Democrats have transformed California into one of their greatest strongholds.  Senator Barbara Boxer, the sponsor of the (unsuccessful) Freedom of Choice Act to enshrine Roe v. Wade in law, is one of the most far left Democrats in the Senate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;That was before all three of her G.O.P. challengers cut her polling advantage to less Read More...</description>
			<author>James Bell</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 22:37:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>upper chamber</category>
 <category>senate report</category>
 <category>predictions</category>
 <category>elections</category>
 <category>barbara boxer</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>White House met with secularist organization on national policy</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/white-house-met-with-secularist-organization-on-national-policy.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;A press release from the Secular Coalition for America:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;Marking the first time in history a presidential administration has met for a policy briefing with the American nontheist community, on February 26 the Secular Coalition for America will engage with White House officials on issues of great concern to the secular movement&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some of their specific goals:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;Fixing Faith-Based Initiatives: Taking all necessary steps Read More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 21:00:00 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>secularism</category>
 <category>progressivism</category>
 <category>faith-based council</category>
 <category>barack obama</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Chuck Donovan on Pelosi and Reid's &quot;Piecrust Promise&quot;</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/chuck-donovan-on-pelosi-and-reids-qpiecrust-promiseq.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://blog.heritage.org/wp-content/uploads/Pelosi-Reid-1001263.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;230&quot; height=&quot;159&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;A memory of history should provide wisdom to help decide what should be done next in the health care debate:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;A piecrust promise is one that is easily made and easily broken. The promise – more a rumor than anything else – that the U.S. Senate will use the reconciliation process to adopt a strong ban on abortion funding if the House pRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 19:29:53 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>upper chamber</category>
 <category>parliamentary procedure</category>
 <category>nancy pelosi</category>
 <category>lower chamber</category>
 <category>health care</category>
 <category>harry reid</category>
 <category>abortion</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wednesday Stupak: Good and Bad</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/wednesday-stupak-good-and-bad.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;The Good - Stupak is not standing down:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;Michigan Democrat Bart Stupak said yesterday at a townhall in his home state, &quot;I'm more optimistic than I was a week ago&quot; that a deal could be reached to pass a health care bill that bans public funding of abortion. Some speculated that this meant Stupak was ready to cave. &quot;Obviously they don&amp;rsquo;t know me,&quot; Stupak said in an interview this afternoon with THE WEEKLY STANDARD. &quot;If I didn&amp;rsquo;t&quot; cave in November, &quot;whRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:04:45 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>health care</category>
 <category>dale kildee</category>
 <category>bart stupak</category>
 <category>abortion</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Wednesday Morning Zen: Pelosi on why we have to pass health care</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/wednesday-morning-zen-pelosi-on-why-we-have-to-pass-health-care.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Why?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;[video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KoE1R-xH5To 480x385]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;So that you can find out what is in it!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 07:28:31 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>video</category>
 <category>outrageous</category>
 <category>nancy pelosi</category>
 <category>health care</category>
 <category>democracy</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Breaking: Stupak has a challenger</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/breaking-stupak-has-a-challenger.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;What are the wages of challenging Nancy Pelosi? Political death by a well-funded leftist challenger, as the Detroit news reports today:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;A Democratic activist announced today she's challenging Rep. Bart Stupak out of her frustration that his hard line on abortion funding threatens to derail sweeping health care legislation pending in Congress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Connie Saltonstall, a former Charlevoix County commissioner and retired businesswoman, acknowledged the difficulty she faces in trying to knocRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 00:48:34 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>pro-abortion</category>
 <category>nancy pelosi</category>
 <category>health care</category>
 <category>bart stupak</category>
 <category>abortion</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Is Stupak getting his way ?</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/is-stupak-getting-his-way-.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.northernlakes.net/images/resized/Bart-Stupak-low.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;287&quot; height=&quot;263&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p class=&quot;MsoNormal&quot;&gt;Is Bart Stupak turning the tables and caving in to Democratic pressure? The Associated Press sure thinks it’s likely: Abortion Battle On Health Bill May End. That is enough to produce a panic attack on pro-life advocates across the nation, causing severe Ben Nelson flashbacks. However, he is only actually quoted as saying that he is moreRead More...</description>
			<author>James Bell</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:21:50 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>nancy pelosi</category>
 <category>health care</category>
 <category>bart stupak</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Federal employees make far more than private employees</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/federal-employees-make-far-more-than-private-employees.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;From USA Today:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;Overall, federal workers earned an average salary of $67,691 in 2008 for occupations that exist both in government and the private sector, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. The average pay for the same mix of jobs in the private sector was $60,046 in 2008, the most recent data available.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;&amp;ldquo;These salary figures do not include the value of health, pension and other benefits, whicRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:00:49 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>wealth redistribution</category>
 <category>outrageous</category>
 <category>big government</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Prager on the difference between Leftists and the Right</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/prager-on-the-difference-between-leftists-and-the-right.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;I admire how Prager critiques Leftist values because they are different from the values of America's founding:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;&quot;I used to believe that the Left and the Right had similar goals for America, that they just differed in the means they wanted to use to get there. I was mistaken. The Left has a very different vision of America than those who hold to America&amp;rsquo;s founding values, most especially individualism and small government. Their vision is one in which a Read More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:46:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>leftism</category>
 <category>founding principles</category>
 <category>economy</category>
 <category>conservatism</category>
 <category>big government</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>All About Eric Massa</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/all-about-eric-massa.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://images.politico.com/global/click/090916_massa_ap_392_regular.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;240&quot; height=&quot;180&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Chief of Staff for Rep. Eric J.J. Massa of New York has just confirmed that the Democrat will in fact be resigning his seat by the end of today.  Eric Massa has come forward today with the claim that Rahm Emmanuel conspired to eliminate him because of his opposition to Obamacare.  To more fully understand what could be gained by eliminating Massa, the situationRead More...</description>
			<author>James Bell</author>
			<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 05:51:27 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>nancy pelosi</category>
 <category>health care</category>
 <category>eric mass</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Doing the health care math in the House</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/doing-the-health-care-math.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.catholicnewsagency.com/images/bartStupakNancyPelosi.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;On November 7, Nancy Pelosi threaded the House Health Care Reform Bill 220-215 with the pro-life Stupak Amendment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Senate passed a health care reform bill without the Stupak Amendment, thus risking the pro-life defeat of health care reform on a bill that spends taxpayer dollars on health care policies that fund abortions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nancy Pelosi cannot afford to lose even one vote:&lt;/p&gt;Read More...</description>
			<author>James Bell</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:00:17 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>nancy pelosi</category>
 <category>health care</category>
 <category>bart stupak</category>
 <category>abortion</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Steyn on how anti-welfare is actually pro-common good</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/steyn-on-how-anti-welfare-is-actually-pro-common-good.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;An important observation from Mark Steyn:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;... When seeking to ingratiate himself with conservative audiences, President Ford liked to say: &quot;A government big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have.&quot; Which is true enough. But there's an intermediate stage: A government big enough to give you everything you want isn't big enough to get you to give any of it back. That's the point Greece is at. Its socialist governmRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:17:24 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>words of wisdom</category>
 <category>welfare state</category>
 <category>economy</category>
 <category>economics</category>
 <category>common good</category>
 <category>big government</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Quote of the Day</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/quote-of-the-day-678.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;From Simon Heffer writing for the UK Telegraph:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;&quot;For a land without a welfare state, America starts to do an effective impersonation of a country with one.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 18:06:15 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>welfare state</category>
 <category>socialism</category>
 <category>quote of the day</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Vulnerable Senate Seat Report: Harry Reid</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/vulnerable-senate-seat-report-harry-reid.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/assets_c/2009/10/reid_lowden_split-cropped-proto-custom_2.jpg&quot; border=&quot;0&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; width=&quot;320&quot; height=&quot;240&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Harry Reid is in deep trouble in Nevada.&amp;nbsp; His poll numbers are tanking.&amp;nbsp; Conservative State Republican Chairwoman and former Miss America runner-up Sue Lowden (above) has pulled ahead of businessman Danny Tarkanian.&amp;nbsp; Either nominee is poised to deliver a double digit demolition to Harry Reid.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Only one person can saRead More...</description>
			<author>James Bell</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:22:16 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>upper chamber</category>
 <category>tea party conservatism</category>
 <category>senate report</category>
 <category>predictions</category>
 <category>harry reid</category>
 <category>elections</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Video: Sen. Reid says &quot;Only 36,000 people lost their jobs today, which is really good&quot;</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/video-sen-reid-says-qonly-36000-people-lost-their-jobs-today-which-is-really-goodq.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Some words of encouragement this Monday morning from our Senate's majority leader:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;[video:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LC211h9AY-4 480x385]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;Way to set the bar low, Senator.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:21:20 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>video</category>
 <category>upper chamber</category>
 <category>harry reid</category>
 <category>economy</category>
 <category>economics</category>
 <category>big government</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Activism for Thee, But Not for Me </title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/fragoso-on-activism-for-thee-but-not-for-me-.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;APP contributor Michael Fragoso returns with a judicious observation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Washington Post’s Dana Milbank trained his fire (no pun intended) at Justice Scalia’s approach to the 2nd Amendment this week.  In his words:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;The liberal justices tried to re-argue their losing position in the Heller case. Stevens asked about a &quot;right to parade around the streets with guns.&quot; Breyer asked if a city can't ban guns even if the ban is &quot;saving hundreds of lives.&quot;&lt;bRead More...</description>
			<author>Administrator</author>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 06:11:10 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>supreme court</category>
 <category>roe v. wade</category>
 <category>michael fragoso</category>
 <category>judicial activism</category>
 <category>abortion</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Krauthammer on free health care ... and free ice cream</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/krauthammer-on-free-health-care-and-free-ice-cream.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;An illustrative example from this morning's Washington Post column by Charles Krauthammer:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;Obama [suggested] that his health-care reform was indeed popular because when you ask people about individual items (for example, eliminating exclusions for pre-existing conditions or capping individual out-of-pocket payments), they are in favor.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Yet mystifyingly they oppose the whole package. How can that be?&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Allow me to demystify. Imagine a bill granting Read More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 16:27:19 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>health care</category>
 <category>charles krauthammer</category>
 <category>barack obama</category>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Gregg on Money and its Future</title>
			<link>http://www.americanprinciplesproject.org/blogs/gregg-on-money-and-its-future.html</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;Our friend at the Acton Institute Samuel Gregg writing for the Public Discourse:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;p style=&quot;padding-left: 30px;&quot;&gt;In his famous critique of the Treaty of Versailles, The Economic Consequences of the Peace (1919), John Maynard Keynes observed: “Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the Capitalist System was to debauch the currency.” History, however, illustrates that the greatest debauchers of money have not been Communist revolutionaries or even run-of-the-mill counteRead More...</description>
			<author>Thomas Peters</author>
			<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:55:47 +0100</pubDate>
		<category>samuel gregg</category>
 <category>public discourse</category>
 <category>money</category>
 <category>monetary policy</category>
 <category>federal reserve</category>
 <category>economy</category>
 <category>ecomonics</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
